Some excerpts that were particularly interesting to me:
Large differences occurred in the percentage of home births by maternal race and ethnicity, and these differences widened over time... In 2008, 1.02 percent of births to non-Hispanic white women were home births, representing a 28 percent increase from 2004, when 0.80 percent of births to non-Hispanic white women were home births. In contrast, the percentage of home births declined slightly for non-Hispanic black women from 0.30 percent in 2004 to 0.28 percent in 2008. In 2008, the percentage of home births was 0.20 for Hispanic women and 0.38 for American Indian women, statistically unchanged from the 2004 figures. In 2008, the percentage of home births was 0.27 for Asian or Pacific Islander women, up from 0.24 percent in 2004. Approximately 94 percent of the increase in the overall percentage of home births from 2004 to 2008 was because of the increase for non-Hispanic white women. In 2008, 83 percent of home births were to non-Hispanic white women, compared with 54 percent of hospital births. [emphasis mine]
In 2008, Montana had the highest percentage of home births (2.18%), followed by Vermont (1.96%) and Oregon (1.91%). Three other states (Alaska, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) had a percentage of home births of 1.50 percent or above. An additional 10 states had 1.00 to 1.49 percent of home births. In contrast, 18 states had less than 0.50 percent of home births.
Interestingly, the recent increase in home births in the United States began before the release of a series of documentaries and newspaper articles about home birth... Such a development is not without precedent. In the United Kingdom, a government-endorsed movement called Changing Childbirth has been credited with leading to a growth in home births that has continued until the present. However, the home birth rate in the United Kingdom had already been increasing for five consecutive years before Changing Childbirth came into being... Women choosing home birth may be a harbinger, as much as a result, of increased activism related to childbirth...
These make me think about the highly culturally specific nature of the homebirth movement in the U.S. White women (in states with small minority populations) are accessing, promoting, and creating change around homebirth, and I would say I see a culture of normalcy arising around out-of-hospital birth in a certain segment of the population. (Overheard outside a prenatal yoga class: "Well, you don't have to pack a bag since you'll be staying at home, but what are YOU packing to bring to the birth center?") There is clearly a lot of privilege at work here...there are so very very few voices speaking to the non-educated-middle-class-white-woman demographic. I often think some of the Hispanic women I work with in CenteringPregnancy would be interested in having their babies in a setting other than the hospital - out-of-hospital birth with midwives being the standard in many countries they/their families come from - but there is simply no way for them to even know that homebirth is possible in the U.S., much less sort through the complicated process of finding and accessing it, insurance-wise. (And I can't pitch homebirth to them in my role, unfortunately!)
It comes back to my frustration that the people with privilege seek out the nurturing, mother-friendly, midwifery care; and the people who need that care the most, so frequently get a prenatal care through a health department or community health center, every visit with a different provider and then labor and delivery with another set of strangers, usually the general OB service at the hospital. I see basically zero outreach to low-income/minority communities from the birth community, and walking my delicate line between working in the system right now, I am guilty of that too. How do we fix this??